Intercultural Design - Task 2: Field Study
24.2.2026 - 8.3.2026/ Week 4 - Week 5
Aida Tan Jie Fei / 0385645
Intercultural Design / Bachelor of Design (Honours) in Creative Media / Taylor's University
Task 2: Field Study
LIST
After receiving feedback and suggestions from Mr. Fitri, our group started discussing our ideas and decided to proceed with Idea 1 for the field study. We then began searching for suitable locations for the field study, and Megan and Peiying were responsible for this part. (Field Study Locations)
Then our group started our field study. We used public transport to travel around Kuala Lumpur while conducting our research. We started the study at Pasar Seni LRT Station, then went to Muzium Negara MRT Station, followed by KL Sentral, and then KLCC LRT Station. Lastly, we ended our field study at Ampang Park LRT Station.
After finishing the field study, we divided the tasks for preparing the PPT.
Research Objective & Canva Template – Megan
Data Collection Method (Observational, Survey, Internet Research) – Megan
Observational – Pei Ying
Survey Data – Irene, Mei
Internet Research – Angel
Analysis of 3 Route Design Ideas – Aida
Selected Design – Aida
I took part in the analysis of the three route designs and selected design. During the field study, we explored several locations and routes. From our exploration, we selected three routes for further analysis: LRT Pasar Seni to Central Market, LRT KLCC to KLCC Convention Centre, and LRT Ampang Park to Intermark Mall.
Blue line – Cool Path
Orange line – Hot Path
From Pasar Seni LRT Station to Central Market, there are two route options that can be categorized as a Cool Path and a Hot Path.
Target Users:
Elderly people
Families with children
Tourists
Pedestrians who prefer a more comfortable and shaded walking environment
Characteristics:
The route mainly passes through shaded walkways and areas with building coverage, creating a cooler and more protected environment. It focuses on comfort and protection from the weather.
Target Users:
Office workers
Daily commuters
Pedestrians who prioritize speed and efficiency
Characteristics:
The route is mostly located in open outdoor spaces with less shade. Although it exposes pedestrians to sunlight and heat, it provides a more straightforward and time-efficient connection.
From KLCC LRT Station to KLCC Convention Centre, there are two route options that can be categorized as a Cool Path and a Hot Path.
Target Users:
Tourists visiting the KLCC area
Families with children
Elderly pedestrians
People who prefer a comfortable indoor environment
Characteristics:
The route is fully connected through indoor spaces such as shopping mall corridors and a link bridge, providing a cool and protected environment with shelter from weather conditions.
Target Users:
Office workers in the KLCC area
Daily commuters
Pedestrians who prioritize speed and efficiency
Characteristics:
The route begins inside the shopping mall before continuing outdoors toward the park. Pedestrians will transition from an indoor environment to an open outdoor space, where they may be exposed to sunlight and heat.
From Ampang Park LRT Station to Intermark Mall, there are two route options that can be categorized as a Cool Path and a Hot Path.
Target Users:
Office workers in the surrounding buildings
Elderly pedestrians
Visitors who prefer a cooler and more comfortable route
Pedestrians who are not in a hurry
Characteristics:
The route mainly follows shaded sidewalks and areas near buildings, providing more protection from the sun. Escalators are used to access the pedestrian bridge, which adds to the comfort and convenience. The walking environment is calmer and more comfortable.
Target Users:
Office workers during busy hours
Daily commuters
Pedestrians who prioritize speed and convenience
Characteristics:
The route mainly passes through open outdoor spaces with less shade. Pedestrians need to use stairs to reach the pedestrian bridge, which adds some physical effort. Although exposed to sunlight and heat, the path provides a more straightforward and time-efficient connection.
After receiving feedback from Mr. Fitri, our group was asked to choose either Idea 1 or 3 for the field study. We decided to work on Idea 1. After some initial research, we went to the KL area to conduct the field study. We visited several locations, and although I felt tired at times, the experience was extremely enjoyable. It gave me the opportunity to explore places I had never been to before, which felt refreshing and exciting.Working together as a team to complete the field study was challenging, but it also gave me a strong sense of achievement. Measuring the routes step by step made me feel like we were slowly bringing our ideas to life. I realized that this task really helped me develop my thinking and allowed me to actively engage with the environment, which taught me a lot.Moreover, seeing everyone participate and contribute strengthened our group dynamic. We were able to better understand each other, communicate more effectively, and build a sense of trust, which made us stronger and more cohesive as a team. Overall, this field study was not only a valuable learning experience but also a reminder of how collaboration and hands-on exploration can deepen understanding and creativity.



Comments
Post a Comment